The leading AI governance credential. Covers the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, risk assessment and the AI lifecycle. $649 for IAPP members, $799 otherwise; retake $475/$625.
Who it's for: Privacy, legal, compliance and risk professionals moving into AI governance. AIGP-aligned salaries are reported at about $141K–$170K.
No formal eligibility rules, but a working grasp of privacy concepts (lawful basis, DPIAs, controller vs processor) makes Domain II much faster
Download the AIGP Body of Knowledge v2.1 (effective 2 February 2026) and keep it open; every phase below maps to its competency codes (I.A to IV.C)
Week 1 · 10 h
AI governance foundations (Domain I)
Define AI, machine learning, generative and agentic AI, and list the characteristics that make AI need its own governance (opacity, autonomy, scale, probabilistic outputs, data dependency)
Map the responsible-AI principles (fairness, safety, privacy, transparency, accountability, human-centricity) to concrete harms to individuals, groups, organisations and society
Distinguish developers, providers, deployers and users, and assign governance roles across legal, privacy, security, data science and procurement
Outline AI life-cycle policies, from use-case intake to incident management, plus third-party and acceptable-use policies
Hands-on: Draft a two-page AI acceptable-use policy and a RACI chart for a 500-person company that is rolling out a chatbot. Name who approves new use cases, who signs off on risk and who handles incidents.
Apply GDPR-style principles (lawful basis, purpose limitation, minimisation, data subject rights, automated decision-making, DPIAs) to AI training and inference
Explain how IP, non-discrimination (employment, credit, housing, insurance), consumer protection and product liability law reach AI systems
Classify systems under the EU AI Act (prohibited, high, limited, minimal risk), list high-risk obligations (risk management, data governance, technical documentation, human oversight, conformity assessment, QMS), GPAI duties and penalty tiers
Recall the NIST AI RMF core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), the OECD principles and the scope of ISO/IEC 22989, 42001 and 42005
Hands-on: Take five real systems (CV-screening tool, customer-service chatbot, spam filter, emotion recognition at work, credit-scoring model) and place each in an EU AI Act risk tier. Cite the article or Annex III entry for each, and say whether your organisation would be the provider or the deployer.
Run an AI impact assessment covering business context, a probability/severity harms matrix, a mitigation hierarchy and stakeholder mapping
Set data-governance requirements, including lawful rights to the training data, data quality and fit-for-purpose checks, lineage and provenance
Plan training and testing across unit, integration, validation, performance, security, bias and interpretability tests, and document the results
Prepare a system for release with a model card, conformity evidence, a monitoring and retraining schedule, red teaming and post-market monitoring
Hands-on: Write an impact assessment for a resume-ranking model. Include a 5x5 harms matrix, three bias tests with pass/fail thresholds, a data-provenance table and a one-page model card.
Compare deployment choices (proprietary vs open-source, small vs large, cloud vs on-premise vs edge, as-is vs fine-tuned vs RAG vs agentic) and their governance trade-offs
Run a deployer-side assessment of a third-party model, including vendor due diligence, contract terms, transparency notices and human-oversight design
Set up post-deployment monitoring for drift, incidents, user feedback and decommissioning criteria
Hands-on: Build a 20-question vendor due-diligence questionnaire for buying a third-party LLM API. Cover training data, retention, sub-processors, evaluation results, incident notification and indemnities.
You can place any described system in an EU AI Act tier and name the provider and deployer obligations without notes
You can name all four NIST AI RMF functions and give two outcomes for each
You have produced an impact assessment and a model card yourself, not just read about them
You score 75% or higher on a full timed mock
Exam tips
The BoK publishes a minimum and maximum question count for each domain. Development and deployment (Domains III and IV) together make up about half the exam, so don't spend all your time on the law.
BoK v2.1 (effective 2 February 2026) names the South Korean AI Basic Law and ISO/IEC 42005, and frames governance around generative and agentic AI. Older prep material may be missing these.
Questions mostly test the understand/apply/analyse levels of Bloom's taxonomy, so practise applying a framework to a scenario rather than reciting definitions.
Start with the provider's official exam guide and free training, then use practice exams to find your weak domains. We never link to exam dumps, which break exam agreements and can get you decertified.